<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Low in Teen Research Methodology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalmediaanalyst.com/2009/07/a-new-low-is-teen-research-methodology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalmediaanalyst.com/2009/07/a-new-low-is-teen-research-methodology/</link>
	<description>Media across the movie theater, TV, PC and mobile screens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: analyst</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediaanalyst.com/2009/07/a-new-low-is-teen-research-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>analyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalmediaanalyst.com/2009/07/a-new-low-is-teen-research-methodology/#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>The kid does have a point but my point is - so what?  Most ads come across that way but the ones that do work (and, yes, people, including teens, even click on online ads) drive a major industry.  Asking if you&#039;d rather not have ads is like asking if I&#039;d like a free vacation.  Sure I would.  But I also understand that I can&#039;t as everything has a price.  Sometimes in money, sometimes in exposure to ads.

Also, I&#039;ve see a lot of research around teen behaviour that shows that while they have the most negative attitudes toward ads, they also most likely to take action due to an advertising/marketing campaign.  After all, who are the most likely to want that new brand show, shirt, iPhone etc etc etc.  That&#039;s a lot of ad and branding driven behaviour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kid does have a point but my point is &#8211; so what?  Most ads come across that way but the ones that do work (and, yes, people, including teens, even click on online ads) drive a major industry.  Asking if you&#8217;d rather not have ads is like asking if I&#8217;d like a free vacation.  Sure I would.  But I also understand that I can&#8217;t as everything has a price.  Sometimes in money, sometimes in exposure to ads.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve see a lot of research around teen behaviour that shows that while they have the most negative attitudes toward ads, they also most likely to take action due to an advertising/marketing campaign.  After all, who are the most likely to want that new brand show, shirt, iPhone etc etc etc.  That&#8217;s a lot of ad and branding driven behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Macenzie</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediaanalyst.com/2009/07/a-new-low-is-teen-research-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-3565</link>
		<dc:creator>James Macenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalmediaanalyst.com/2009/07/a-new-low-is-teen-research-methodology/#comment-3565</guid>
		<description>The kid has a point!  online ads are annoying and pointless - do you know of anyone sensible who has clicked on one?  Deliberately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kid has a point!  online ads are annoying and pointless &#8211; do you know of anyone sensible who has clicked on one?  Deliberately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
